Sierra Canyon, Somersett, Villages, The Vue – Your Community Forum

Proposed CC&R Amendments

Posted by Joe Bower

Comments and questions on BOD letter to homeowners regarding proposed changes to he SOA CC&R’s  (Para = change letter paragraph reference):

Owners should not vote for or against something they don’t fully understand, especially when their money is affected … BETTER TO ABSTAIN!!!

Para 1 . . . Why don’t we have the actual text of the proposed changes?

Para 3  . . . Should BOD even have the authority to acquire, purchase, lease and annex property without association members (owners) approval . . . this is one of the first questions to ask!

Para 5 . . . talks about controlling the Town Center . . . Town Center is a commercial development and Somersett Owners Association (SOA) Board should stay as far away from it as possible (unless we own it) . . . Have heard the Center has its own CC&R’s which should make it a sub-association of SOA . . . they need to be enforced by SOA . . . do they pay dues to SOA or is it just a unique stand alone association within  Somersett?

Para 6 . . . re example about buying a second lot . . . that would only give SOA 2/5 lots . . . that still doesn’t give SOA  control of the Town Center. Is BOD planning some purchases?

Para 7 . . . leasing loft … that should be put to an owner vote. There is nothing wrong with owners voting on what they do and don’t want. That is what happens in well-run openly managed associations.

 Proposed Changes:

1 … Where owners vote on these issues the outcome will be determined by majority of votes cast as long a minimum quorum of votes is cast. A quorum is 20% therefore only a positive vote of 10% plus 1 of owners would be needed to spend 100% of the money of all owners. All owners need to be able to vote.

2 … Says that BOD could spend $500,000 as long as assessments aren’t raised more than NRS116 allows. What NRS 116 section is that? The CC&Rs say assessments can’t be raised more than 15% without a vote of the members. Is this an attempt to circumvent the 15% that is already a large number?

3 . . . What stops BOD from making multiple $500K deals?

4 … For a lease it must be within normal assessment authority … and what is that in $ and %. If the same 15% number is used, it seems that it could be in the $600,000 range … assuming a $4M budget. The present budget already has $750,000 for Somersett Country Club so it seems that you assume that it could be at least as large as that.

5 … seems that this has the same problem as about only takes 10% of homeowners to approve.

6… says two provisions in item 4. Where and what are these? ….is vote in this section again a 10% vote?

7 … What are sections 16 and 17… appears owners are being asked to vote on changes we haven’t seen or read!

8. . . says BOD has authority to operate and maintain common elements …including capital improvements in the operating budget may be a violation of NRS 116  which says that BOD shall repair, replace, maintain and restore…..doesn’t give any other authority . . . also this would probably be a violation of IRS tax exemption for the association …. on reserve funds

Owners would have to be crazy to give away their right to vote on how their Association is run and their money is spent.

 

Advertisements

Comments on: "Proposed CC&R Amendments" (1)

  1. Verdi Peak View said:

    Reporting from Aspen Lodge Town Hall

    The new CCR’s and rules for voting were too hastily put together and sent out for us to vote on. They should be recalled and the changes clarified so us older folks can understand them.

    1. On the new voting changes – there was no clarity, the board obsfurcated as to which rules how many votes actually applied, answered the same question from different residents with “many almost incomprehensible” answers. There is no definition of the word quorum – other it reprsesnts 20% – but 20% of what and for when???

    2. Questions were raised on the $500K limit to board spending without a community vote, thats a lot of money for a “business” only doing $4.8 million. This would not happen in most businesses. A limit of $250K would seem more reasonable.

    Several attendees complemented the board on their hard work and sometimes thankless task. However, whats the rush, why cant we have the town hall meetings about the proiposed changes before we get them sent to us for a yes or no vote. Many associationbs allow you to vote yes/no/abstain on each change line by line. We have an all or nothing situation.

    Lets hope the board listens

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: